House demands WH docs, testimony

Published: Nov. 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

WASHINGTON, Nov. 5 (UPI) -- U.S. House Democrats Monday demanded access to disputed administration documents and testimony related to the firing of nine U.S. attorneys last year.

The House Judiciary Committee said in a letter to White House Counsel Fred Fielding the administration has until Friday to work out a deal if it wants to avoid a contempt of Congress charges against former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten.

The Washington Post reported leaders have been working to round up enough floor votes for the contempt citation and won't bring the issue up unless the support is there. The letter was sent one day before the Senate Judiciary Committee was expected to vote on the nomination of retired Judge Michael Mukasey as U.S. attorney general, replacing Alberto Gonzales, who was pushed out over the U.S. attorney firings.

The White House maintains Miers doesn't have to testify before Congress on the issue and Bolten doesn't need to turn over any documents because both involve the administration's internal deliberations.

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
NFL: New England 31, New York Jets 14 (16 min)
NFL: San Diego 32, Denver 3 (31 min)
NFL: Arizona 21, St. Louis 13 (40 min)
NHL: Tampa Bay 4, Atlanta 3 (OT)
McPherson takes lead in LPGA Championship
Alzheimer's help for blacks in Kentucky
NBA: Charlotte 104, Indiana 88
fark
Lots and lots of people would rather die than continue working for France Telecom
Doctors discover patient trapped in a 23-year 'coma' has been conscious all along
Despite efforts to discourage them, Iraqi refugees keep flocking to Detroit, since living in a war-torn...
Congratulations to the unnamed motorist who received Virginia's first $1,000 traffic ticket for...
If you are in Salinas, CA on Tuesday night and find yourself at a DUI checkpoint, you will either...
Next on the docket: Case No. 1950cv05050: Mouse vs. Duck for trademark infringement. Bonus: The...