Mobile UPI  |   About UPI  |   UPI en Español  |   UPI Arabic  |   UPIU  |   My Account
Search:
Go

U.S. court lifts sonar stay for now

|
|
 
  
Published: Sept. 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 1 (UPI) -- A California court has ruled in favor of the Navy’s testing of high-powered sonar, although the decision won't stop efforts to end the practice.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said national security was not given adequate consideration by a lower court judge who issued an injunction blocking the use of the booming sonar to train submarine crews off the California coast.

The sound waves produced by active sonar can detect enemy subs miles away. But environmentalists contend it also is powerful enough to threaten whales and other marine mammals unfortunate enough to get in the way.

“The safety of our whales must be weighed, and so must the safety of our warriors, and of our country," the appellate court said in its 2-1 ruling Friday.

The Los Angeles Times said another 9th Circuit panel is considering more in-depth arguments about sonar and could reinstate the lower court stay.

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
  
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
The Tibetan Moniam Festival in China Super Bowl XLVI ticker tape victory parade The making of the Oscars
The Chicago Auto Show The Most Desirable Women of 2012 Tu Bishvat Migron settlement
Additional Top News Stories
1 of 20
Syrian protests continue
View Caption
fark
Survey finds that men are quick to fall in love, roll over and fall asleep
Nerdiest sport ever: Combat juggling
Photoshop this topless athlete
Man rejects girlfriend's noodles, says toodles by leaving her in poodle of blood. Oodles of boodle...
Mormons tried to posthumously baptize Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel but were...
School principals should probably have background checks processed on them before they are hired...or...