Vets win Agent Orange benefits

Published: July 20, 2007 at 1:48 PM
Order reprints
SAN FRANCISCO, July 20 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court in San Francisco has upheld a lower court ruling backing Vietnam veterans who got cancer from exposure to the defoliant Agent Orange.

In the latest case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for continuing to resist paying benefits to some 31,000 veterans who contracted leukemia as a result of serving in Vietnam, The Los Angeles Times reported Friday.

"Those young Americans who risked their lives in their country's service and are even today suffering greatly as a result are deserving of better treatment from the Department of Veterans Affairs than they are currently receiving," Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote in the opinion.

What is difficult to understand, he said, is why the department continues to resist implementing a settlement agreed to 16 years ago.

The attorney for the plaintiffs, Barton Stichman, predicts Thursday's appellate court ruling will lead to millions in benefits for disabled veterans.


© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Nickelodeon not buying La. Six Flags (7 min)
Son of U.N. official kidnapped in Lebanon (8 min)
Jim Carrey to be a grandfather (11 min)
Man gored to death in Pamplona run (12 min)
Iran may have nuclear bomb in a year (17 min)
Canadian plane crashes on landing approach (29 min)
Aung San Suu Kyi's trial resumes (30 min)
fark
Convicted rapist cites fear of having to ingest killer red onions in jail in bid to avoid sentencing....
Over a 30-day period, U.S. Marshalls arrested over 35k figitives netting 2,356 sex-offenders, 433...
Tennessee Aquarium presents a bowl full of ugly-ass baby penguin. A little milk and we'll have a...
Judge allows Twitter-using DA to 'tweet' upcoming muder trial over defense objections. Prosecution's...
Photoshop theme: The end of the universe
NY Times thinks their website users would pay five bucks per month. Listen, for the last time, no...