U.S. Supreme Court to consider child porn

Published: March. 27, 2007 at 11:20 AM

WASHINGTON, March 27 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider restoring part of the child pornography law that outlawed sending messages offering pornography.

A federal appeals court in Atlanta ruled last year that the provision was too far-reaching and threw it out, the Los Angeles Times reported. The justices decided Monday to reconsider the law and will hear arguments on it in the fall.

Under the law being reconsidered, a person could be prosecuted for sending a computer message offering child pornography.

The Times said the provision was struck down in the case of John Mitchell, a South Florida man who pleaded guilty to advertising on the Internet nude photos of his 4-year-old daughter and for possessing child pornography.

The Atlanta appeals court agreed with his lawyer that the advertising part of the law was too broad and could punish people who sent messages about pornography that didn't exist.

U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement argued in favor of the law. Those who traffic in "what purports to be child pornography deserve no sanctuary," he said.

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Treasury reports on mortgage programs
NBA: Utah 120, Orlando 111
NHL: Los Angeles 3, Phoenix 2 (SO)
NHL: Vancouver 4, Atlanta 2
UPI Sports Calendar for Friday, Dec. 11
NBA: Boston 104, Washington 102
COL BKB: Syracuse 85, Florida 73
fark
Giant rabbit that thinks it's a cocker spaniel would like you to shut the fark up you farking farker...
Knowing the average Farker, I'd say about half of you will try this at work
Man skydiving to celebrate his 70th birthday dies in mid-fall
Another sign the economy is roaring back to life: Opticians can't keep up with the demand for monocles...
And so it begins: Tiger Woods mistress #1, Rachel Uchitel, is in talks to pose for Playboy
Photoshop this man with his dogs