About UPI  |  UPI en Español   |   My Account
Free News Update:
United Press International - News. Analysis. Insight.™ - 100 Years of Journalistic Excellence
  • Home
  • Top News
  • Entertainment
  • Odd News
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Football
    • Golf
    • Olympics 2008
    • Tennis
  • Business
  • Science
  • Health
  • Analysis
    • Energy Resources
    • Security Industry
    • Emerging Threats
  • Media
    • Video
    • News Photos
  • Features
    • The Voice of Young Voters
    • Path to the Presidency
    • Energy
    • Beijing Olympics 2008
Search:
Go
You are here:  Home / Security Industry / Outside View: Nuke power future -- Part 2

Security Industry

View archive | RSS Feed

Outside View: Nuke power future -- Part 2

By SERGEI GOLUBCHIKOV, UPI Outside View Commentator
Published: May 1, 2008 at 1:09 PM
Order reprints  |  Print Story  |  Email to a Friend  |  Post a Comment
People who read this also read ...
  • Outside View: Nuke power future -- Part 1

MOSCOW, May 1 (UPI) -- Uranium prices are increasing throughout the world; over the past three years, they have doubled, and not surprisingly. One cubic centimeter of uranium is equivalent to 60,000 liters of gasoline, 110 to 160 metric tons of coal, or 60,000 cubic meters of natural gas.

Being highly concentrated, this fuel can be easily and cheaply transported any distance. Its price factored in as part of generated power is comparatively small. So even a massive rise in uranium fuel prices has little effect on nuclear power costs. Since 1997 they have gone up by just 7 percent.

With current uranium production at 3,400 metric tons a year, its reserves will last for half a century. How will Russia's nuclear industry fare once the explored reserves run out? There are two options. The first is to look for an alternative way of supplying fuel for the nuclear industry. One is to use so-called "fast reactors" -- fast-breeder nuclear reactors.

Their advantages are moderate power intensity and low fuel consumption. Fast reactors can use uranium from poor fields, with a low degree of enrichment.

Another way is to recycle spent fuel, namely to obtain plutonium fuel separated from the uranium extracted from nuclear reactors.

Continued 1   2   Next >
RATE THIS ARTICLE
    Poor    1    2    3    4    5  Excellent    
Feedback


© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment. No Registration Required.
News Photos Slideshows
Photos of the Day
Week in Photos
News
Entertainment
Sports
Features
Archives
Olympics 2008
Path to the Presidency
UPI Features - The Voice of Young Voters
Most Popular
Stories
Photos
Videos
People
1.
U.S. needs frigates, LCS to fight modern pirates
2.
Russia fudges pledge not to sell S-300s to Iran
3.
Analysis: Venezuela seeks military power
4.
Russia, China boost Iran's ICBM program
5.
India puts Russia ahead of U.S. for arms imports




Videos
Enlarge Video
Reaction: Does peace have a prize?
Reaction: Does peace have a prize?
Friday, October 10
From Wall Street to a Maryland Main Street
From Wall Street to a Maryland Main Street
Friday, October 10
Debate #2: The economy
Debate #2: The economy
Friday, October 10
Economics vs. foreign policy in the media
Economics vs. foreign policy in the media
Thursday, October 9
© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Official Government Wires  |   About UPI  |   Site Map  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy  |   Advertise Online  |   Contact Us

Sponsored Links: Fundraisers - Press Release Services - prom dresses - Prom dresses and gowns - Public Records - Wedding and Honeymoon Experts - Motivational Sports Speakers Bureau