Satellite shooting unneeded says scientist

Published: Aug. 26, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Order reprints
BOSTON, Aug. 26 (UPI) -- The U.S. Navy's February missile shoot down of a spy satellite was unnecessary, a Harvard scientist and former NASA employee said.

Yousaf Butt filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking for the National Air and Space Agency's re-entry threat analysis from the disabled USA-193 satellite. His conclusions contradict the government's official explanation that the satellite's hydrazine fuel tank posed a health hazard.

Butt described government modeling as oversimplified and biased against likelihoods that the tank would have burned when re-entering the atmosphere.

"The official study released so far certainly doesn't support the contention that the tank

would have survived intact to the ground. In fact, despite its optimistic oversimplifications, the

released study indicates that the tank would certainly have demised high up in the atmosphere" he wrote in the Aug. 21 Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.


© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Armenia, Azerbaijan urged to end dispute (9 min)
Cousin: Jacko viewing was open casket (17 min)
Economic Outlook: Huffing about homes (25 min)
Poll: Most want Sotomayor confirmed (29 min)
Nickelodeon not buying La. Six Flags (43 min)
Son of U.N. official kidnapped in Lebanon (44 min)
Jim Carrey to be a grandfather (47 min)
fark
Mynd you, møsquitø bites Kan be pretty nasti
"Sometimes, you get what you expect. Generally, you meet better people at church than you do at...
They should have known that you can't just walk down the streets of Manhattan dressed as Superman...
The coolest origami city you will see until the artist burns it down. Wait, what?
Budgie will become a hero, and a father, after flying out to sea
Convicted rapist cites fear of having to ingest killer red onions in jail in bid to avoid sentencing....