Clean coal plants mired by cost and delays

Published: Dec. 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM
Related Company

WASHINGTON, Dec. 27 (UPI) -- Clean coal-fired plants offer a cleaner fuel source but construction costs and increased greenhouse gas standards in the United States hamper their production.

Regulators canceled, suspended or refused several plans to develop clean coal-fired plants citing construction costs, technological pitfalls and regulation regarding greenhouse gas emissions, USA Today said Thursday.

Clean coal-fired plants cost 20 percent more to build than standard plants but long-term expenses are 20 percent less than standard plants, Ed Rubin, an environmental engineering scientist with Carnegie Mellon University, told USA Today.

Only two clean coal-fired plants operate in the United States but that number may increase because the newer plants are more readily retrofitted to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the newspaper said.

The Ohio-based electric utility American Electric Power is proposing two new clean coal-fired plants in Ohio and West Virginia.

"I think it's essential that we as a nation take advantage of one of the indigenous fuel sources we have," said Michael Morris with AEP.

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints




Additional News Stories
Your Daily Horoscope (13 min)
The almanac (43 min)
Retailers: As snow falls, so do sales
NBA: Washington 118, Golden State 109
NHL: Vancouver 3, Washington 2
Woman allegedly stole case of Scotch
NBA: Houston 116, Dallas 108 (OT)
fark
Virginia getting slammed with 20 inches
Whiskey hangovers worse than vodka hangovers, still no cure for Whiskey hangovers
If you're traveling through Denver International Airport and find $170,000 laying around, can you...
Cows have taken over Clark County
Shortage of ugly sweaters threatens to ruin ironic hipster parties
Yeah, you probably have mad cow disease