New theory changes old view of bubbles

Published: Aug. 21, 2007 at 1:02 PM
Order reprints
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind., Aug. 21 (UPI) -- U.S. scientists have discovered what they say is a fundamental flaw in the conventional view of how liquids form bubbles that grow and turn into vapors.

The findings by Purdue University chemical engineers led by Associate Professor David Corti cast doubt on some aspects of a long-standing theory that attempts to describe the underlying molecular mechanism behind a phenomenon called "homogeneous nucleation."

In the conventional view, a liquid boiling and turning into a vapor takes place in a systematic process known as "nucleation and growth." The liquid first forms tiny "nuclei," or microscopic bubbles, that grow as they pick up particles. Such a conventional view is described by "classical nucleation theory," which was proposed in the 1920s.

"Our findings indicate this is not what's going on," Corti said. "The bubble grows via a mechanism very different from classical nucleation theory."

The findings by Corti and chemical engineering doctoral student Mark Uline are detailed online in the journal Physical Review Letters.


© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Walking on sand safer than playing in sand (<1 min)
Vickers wins latest Sprint pole position (2 min)
Brown: Britain's nuke stockpile may be cut (5 min)
DNA said to implicate mobster in '77 death (6 min)
1 in 3 Greeks could fall ill with H1N1 flu (23 min)
Truex to join Waltrip Racing (27 min)
Cleaning product blamed for airport odor (29 min)
fark
You're worried about losing your job. Do you a) improve your performance, b) look for something...
Teenage hit-and-runner uses Self-Arrest lane to be booked and released in twenty minutes. Would...
Woman's laugh sounds like a car horn
AAA warns motorists to expect 1 of every 100 highway miles to be under construction this summer....
Sign for small Canadian town is hilariously vandalized to advertise certain illicit activity. City...
German zoo admits that, in hindsight, it may have been a mistake to name one of its monkeys "Obama"...