Study disputes Darwinian theory

Published: June 11, 2007 at 2:47 PM
Order reprints
DAVIS, Calif., June 11 (UPI) -- A Darwinian theory is being disputed by two U.S. botanists who are studying columbine (Aquilegia) flowers.

Justen Whittall and Scott Hodges of the University of California-Davis said the flowers' long petals might have evolved in a predictable way but not for the reason Darwin predicted.

Whittall and Hodges assessed the evolutionary relatedness of Aquilegia -- a group of herbaceous perennial plants in which each petal is modified into an elongated nectar spur. The scientists report they have determined the nectar spurs evolved in a recurring and directional fashion, becoming longer and longer over time.

The team said that shape evolved in a punctuated manner, with plants adapting to new species of unrelated pollinators, each with a longer tongue than its predecessor. That theory, however, is at odds with Darwin's prediction that a co-evolutionary conflict drove the increase in length of both nectar spur and pollinator's tongue.

The study appears in the journal Nature.


© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



MLB: Boston 1, Kansas City 0 (1 min)
MLB: Cincinnati 3, New York Mets 0 (14 min)
MLB: Philadelphia 3, Pittsburgh 2 (17 min)
Couple with large adoptive family killed (25 min)
Gays plan vigil for slain sailor (27 min)
UPI NewsTrack TopNews (30 min)
Sore neck sidelines Phelps at nationals (43 min)
fark
Photoshop these creepy earrings
Patronizing Tijuana hookers while on drugs may be unhealthy, according to Dr. N.S. Sherlock, of...
Defense lawyers request words like "polygamy,""cult" and "compound" not be used in their client's...
TSG Mugshot roundup: Twin billing
Barbie-Con visitors split on major issue: Are you allowed to open her box and play with it?
It's been 10 years since "The Blair Witch Project." Where were you when this crappy, one-joke, overhyped...