About UPI  |  UPI en Español   |   My Account
Free News Update:
United Press International - News. Analysis. Insight.™ - 100 Years of Journalistic Excellence
  • Home
  • Top News
  • Entertainment
  • Odd News
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Science
  • Health
  • Analysis
    • Energy Resources
    • Security Industry
    • Emerging Threats
  • Video
  • News Photos
Search:
Go
Bookmark this Page
You are here:  Home / Top News / Apartheid suits to go forward

Top News

View archive | RSS Feed

Apartheid suits to go forward

Published: May 12, 2008 at 2:35 PM
Order reprints  |  Print Story  |  Email to a Friend  |  Post a Comment
Close
Apartheid suits to go forward
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts participates in the dedication of the Newseum in Washington on April 11, 2008. (UPI Photo/Roger L. Wollenberg)
WASHINGTON, May 12 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court, unable to act because four justices had conflicts of interest, Monday allowed apartheid-related suits against companies to go forward.

But the 34 U.S. and foreign companies turned away by the high court still have a chance to have the suits dismissed. The companies allegedly profited by South Africa's racial laws, which ended in 1994.

A federal appeals court in New York rejected the companies' assertion that the reparations lawsuits couldn't be brought against private corporations under the 1789 Aliens Tort Act but didn't deal with their assertion that the suits should be dismissed out of "deference" to the executive branch. The U.S. Justice Department has taken the side of the corporations in court.

The high court rejection of the case means the case now returns to a federal judge in Brooklyn for a ruling on the "deference" argument, SCOTUSBLOG.com reported.

The U.S. Supreme Court must have six sitting justices to have a quorum. In an order Monday, the court said Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito took no part in the decision to reject the cases. Though the court offered no explanation, the recusals usually mean justices or their close relatives have stock in the companies in the case.

(No. 07-919, American Isuzu Motors, et al vs. Ntsebeza, et al.)



© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
News Photos Slideshows
Photos of the Day
Week in Photos
News
Entertainment
Sports
Features
Most Popular
Stories
Photos
Videos
1.
Source: Bush will attack Iran
2.
U.S. lawyer urges Iran to sue over nukes
3.
Man who had a teen 'sex slave' avoids jail
4.
Arab League condemns ICC prosecutor
5.
Gergen: Obama erred in airing Maliki talks
Advertise on UPI.com
Videos
Enlarge Video
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Government bailout: will it work?
Wednesday, July 23
U.S. troops: Pull out or keep fighting?
U.S. troops: Pull out or keep fighting?
Tuesday, July 22
Obama in Iraq
Obama in Iraq
Monday, July 21
Home funerals: Tending to their own
Home funerals: Tending to their own
Thursday, July 3
© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Official_Government_Wires  |   About UPI  |   Site Map  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy  |   Advertise Online  |   Contact Us

Sponsored Links: Auto Dealers - College Football Tickets - Press Release Services - prom dresses - Prom dresses and gowns - Wedding and Honeymoon Experts - Conventions - Trade Shows - Conferences - Motivational Sports Speakers Bureau - Real Estate Properties in the world