La. court to hear 2005 hurricane cases
Published: Feb. 25, 2008 at 3:02 PM
NEW ORLEANS, Feb. 25 (UPI) -- The Louisiana Supreme Court scheduled two hurricane-related cases that could affect thousands of insurance claims related to storms Katrina and Rita.
The first case pits 92-year old Joseph Sher against the Lafayette Insurance Co.
Sher claims damage to his four-unit rental property during the 2005 storms should have been covered because of the failure of man-made flood-control structures, The Times-Picayune newspaper in New Orleans reported.
The second case involves Mark and Barbara Laundry's claim that a 108-year old "value policy" state law requires insurance companies to pay full value of their destroyed home, even though their policy stipulated they had coverage for wind but not flood damage.
Lower courts have ruled that damage done by multiple forces, such as wind and flood, are covered, although the "value policy" law mentions only fire protection, the paper reported.
The Sher case could alter payments to plaintiffs listed in state Attorney General Charles Foti's case against 168 insurance companies, analysts said.
"I would think the attorney general's suit would rise or fall on how the Supreme Court comes out on the Sher case," Tulane Law School Dean Edward Sherman told The Times-Picayune.
The cases are to be argued Tuesday.
The first case pits 92-year old Joseph Sher against the Lafayette Insurance Co.
Sher claims damage to his four-unit rental property during the 2005 storms should have been covered because of the failure of man-made flood-control structures, The Times-Picayune newspaper in New Orleans reported.
The second case involves Mark and Barbara Laundry's claim that a 108-year old "value policy" state law requires insurance companies to pay full value of their destroyed home, even though their policy stipulated they had coverage for wind but not flood damage.
Lower courts have ruled that damage done by multiple forces, such as wind and flood, are covered, although the "value policy" law mentions only fire protection, the paper reported.
The Sher case could alter payments to plaintiffs listed in state Attorney General Charles Foti's case against 168 insurance companies, analysts said.
"I would think the attorney general's suit would rise or fall on how the Supreme Court comes out on the Sher case," Tulane Law School Dean Edward Sherman told The Times-Picayune.
The cases are to be argued Tuesday.
© 2008 United Press International. All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be reproduced, redistributed, or manipulated in any form.
This material may not be reproduced, redistributed, or manipulated in any form.
» Next in Business:
Siemens to downsize telecommunications
Latest Headlines
- India special force to fight Maoists
- FLDS elder complains to Bush about raid
- Tailored minority asthma education works
- Poll: Bush's approval hits all-time low
- Outer Critics Circle honors 'August'
- Poor indoor air quality can trigger asthma
- United States routs Norway in World Hockey
- Teen given life in decapitation case
Most Popular
- UPI NewsTrack Quirks in the News
- British pet psychic helps find lost dog
- Man cuts car in half to make a point
- Speedo-wearing beach bum sues cops
- Baseballs bombard homes; field shut down
- Pastor says to forgive skull pot smokers
- Commander probed in nude shooting case
- Romantic teen runs afoul of girl's dad