WASHINGTON, June 24 (UPI) -- The burden of U.S. deficit reduction should not fall on the backs of one of the country's most vulnerable groups -- elderly women -- an advocacy group says.
A report by the National Women's Law Center says various deficit-reduction plans, including the deficit talks convened by Vice President Joe Biden, call for switching Social Security's cost of living adjustment to a chained Consumer Price Index.
"This proposal is a stealth attack on the economic security of older women," Joan Entmacher of National Women's Law Center in Washington said in a statement. "That is a shameful way to solve our nation's deficit problem."
Older women are already more economically vulnerable than older men -- they often spend fewer years in the workforce because they take care children, the elderly and spouses -- and these cuts would leave many of them unable to meet basic needs, Entmacher said.
For example, for a woman who gets a benefit of $1,100 at age 65 -- the median monthly benefit of all single women 65 and older -- replacing the current COLA with the chained CPI would mean $56 less per month and $672 less per year at age 80, the report said.
"That may not sound like a big cut to some members of Congress -- but it translates to a loss of more than a week's worth of food per month or 13 weeks of food in a year," Entmacher said in a statement. "At age 90, that would mean $87 less per month and more than $1,000 less that year so a woman with an initial benefit of $1,100 a month will lose more than $6,300 by age 80 and more than $15,000 by age 90."
The report is at: www.nwlc.org/resource/cutting-social-security-cola-changing-way-inflation-calculated-would-especially-hurt-women.
|Additional Health News Stories|
OGDEN, Utah, June 17 (UPI) --Police have identified the victim of Sunday's shooting in a Roman Catholic church in Utah as James Evans; his son-in-law was charged with the crime.
PRINCETON, N.J., June 17 (UPI) --A large majority of U.S. workers do not like their jobs with a significant portion of them disruptive in at least a passive-aggressive sense, a survey found.