Study: Wealth affects cancer rate

Published: Sept. 26, 2008 at 7:46 PM

MANCHESTER, England, Sept. 26 (UPI) -- Cervical and lung cancer are more common in poor people while rates of breast cancer and melanoma are higher in the wealthy, British researchers said.

Lorraine Shack at the North West Cancer Intelligence Service and a team of researchers working on behalf of the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries used information from all eight British cancer registries from 1998 to 2003.

"We looked at all invasive cases of lung cancer, cervical cancer, malignant melanoma of the skin and female breast cancer," Shack said in a statement.

Women from affluent socioeconomic groups are more likely to have their first child at a later age, have fewer children in their lifetime and take hormone replacement therapy -- each is associated with a slightly higher incidence of breast cancer, the researchers said. The higher incidence of melanoma in the more wealthy groups may be partially explained by holidays in sunny climates.

The higher incidence of lung cancer is squarely blamed on smoking, Shack said.

The findings are published in the journal BMC Cancer.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Florida man thought priest was terrorist (29 min)
Verizon Florida to pay $2M settlement (53 min)
Prof: Seven types of recession employees
British unemployment rebounds slightly
Yuan currency trade accepted in Indonesia
Catholics can believe in alien life
Language support key to kids with autism
fark
Okay then, your request to leave Scientology has been approved, all that remains is for you to claim...
PROTIP: If you're trying to lure cats out of hiding, don't use a lighter. It can only end one of...
Some new fathers pass out cigars after the birth of their newborn. Others gather up the placenta...
Get run over by a secret service agent once, shame on you. Get run over by a secret service agent...
To our Fark Veterans on Veterans Day: Here is a thread full of snark and thanks
Three more scientists quit in protest at the Great Nutt Sack Controversy