Vitamin E poor antioxidant for the heart

Published: Aug. 23, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Order reprints
NASHVILLE, Aug. 23 (UPI) -- U.S. researchers suggest that previous studies that show vitamin E does not prevent heart attacks may have been flawed by their design.

Investigators at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville suggest the earlier studies all had a fundamental flaw -- all of the studies were designed in a way that never assessed the ability of the dose of vitamin E tested to reduce oxidant stress.

Dr. Jack Roberts and Dr. Jason Morrow determined it took 16 weeks at a very high dose of vitamin E -- 3200 IU/day -- to suppress oxidative stress in individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease.

The researchers then administered varying doses -- 0, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 IU/day -- over the 16-week period to find the minimum effective dose. They found it was necessary to give at least 1600 IU per day to cause a significant reduction in oxidative stress -- twice the amount used in some clinical trials.

However, even with a massive dose of vitamin E the researchers observed a 50 percent reduction in F2- isoprostanes -- a measure of oxidative stress status, the journal Free Radical Biology and Medicine reported.

"In my opinion, vitamin E is not the spiffy antioxidant everybody thinks it is -- it’s a pretty poor antioxidant," Roberts said in a statement.


© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Jockstrip: The world as we know it. (19 min)
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
Panetta: Congress not told of CIA program
Biden goes on the road to defend stimulus
The two-edged sword of online games
Rio Tinto employees face spy charges
fark
Over a 30-day period, U.S. Marshalls arrested over 35k figitives netting 2,356 sex-offenders, 433...
Tennessee Aquarium presents a bowl full of ugly-ass baby penguin. A little milk and we'll have a...
Judge allows Twitter-using DA to 'tweet' upcoming muder trial over defense objections. Prosecution's...
Photoshop theme: The end of the universe
NY Times thinks their website users would pay five bucks per month. Listen, for the last time, no...
Fewer calories allow monkeys to live longer. Good thing you're not a monkey