Israeli model defends invitation photo

Published: June 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

NEW YORK, June 20 (UPI) -- An Israeli model says the use of her sexy photo on a party invitation was meant to bolster -- not tarnish -- her homeland's image.

The Israeli Consulate sparked controversy among female politicians in Israel when it sent out an official invitation featuring a steamy photo of former Miss Israel, Gal Gadot.

The invitation was for a New York event sponsored by Maxim to promote its upcoming "Women of the Israeli Defense Forces" issue.

Former Consul-General Colette Avital condemned the picture as "pornographic," a claim Gadot vehemently denied.

"Obviously, I don't think it's pornographic, or I wouldn't have done it," Gadot told The New York Post. "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Israel is a democracy and that's what it's all about."

Israeli Consul-General Arye Mekel defended the photos.

"This is the first time we used the word 'shoot' in connection to Israel and we're not talking about killing people," Mekel joked.

However, Mekel admitted Avital had vented her concerns to him.

"She expressed her point of view to me," Mekel said. "I responded. It's a legitimate disagreement."

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints




Additional News Stories
Abandoned baby thanks rescuers (3 min)
Home Depot dehumidifiers recalled (9 min)
Dorel car seats recalled (12 min)
London police warn of 'hugger-muggers' (19 min)
McNair's friend knew some of his teammates (33 min)
Researchers: Maturity may up sex benefits (33 min)
Morgan Stanley CEO to pass on bonus pay (47 min)
fark
Study finds 1 in 110 children has autism study finds
A tasty tragedy, 60 cows are killed in barn fire. Accidental BBQ trifecta now in play
Website of highly repected, Pulitzer-winning newspaper based in a major metropolitian area publishs...
Naked grinch launches furious attack on Carvel ice cream shop's Christmas decorations
There has been a Tiger Woods sighting near Houston. Wait what? Oh someone saw a tiger in the woods...
Nebraska's supreme court rules that owners whose dogs are playful and cause injury are not liable...