C-5 aircraft to receive add-on armor

Published: March. 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM

MCLEAN, Va., March 28 (UPI) -- The U.S. Air Force announced it has contracted Last Armor to supply add-on armor kits for use on the C-5 transport aircraft.

Last, a division of QinetiQ North America's Technology Solutions Group, says the add-on armor contract is the 330th Contracting Aircraft Sustainment Wing at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia. The deal is for $16.3 million.

Officials say the add-on armor offers additional protection to the aircraft's crucial flight systems and to aircrews as the C-5s operate increasingly in combat zones like Afghanistan and Iraq. The latest Air Force contract adds to Last's already long history of supplying armor for fixed-wing aircraft supporting the Air Force's C-130s and C-17s with add-on armor.

"The Last Armor team's hard work and dedication was vital to the C-5 in supporting its urgent and compelling need to provide armor to the entire C-5 fleet," Thomas Chester, Robins AFB program manager, said in a statement. "This effort will provide protection, survivability of crew and aircraft, and allow for operation of aircraft in critical locations."

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints


Soderling first through to ATP semifinals (5 min)
UPI NewsTrack Health and Science News (25 min)
U.S., Japan to sign 'open skies' agreement (33 min)
UPI NewsTrack Business (49 min)
Crude oil prices rebound slightly (57 min)
'Galaxy game' lets people help astronomers (58 min)
UPI NewsTrack Quirks in the News
fark
Photoshop this guy in reflective shades
Suing Activision over World of Warcraft? Don't forget to subpoena Depeche Mode and Winona Rider,...
Hannity: This is one of the coldest years on record, so global warming is a hoax. Science: This...
Spotted cow removed from Mad River in NY. The image in your mind's eye is wrong
This is why you can't have nice things, America: "rather than a retelling of the Nativity story...
Canadian judge rules that the Happy Gilmore golf swing is wrong, biatch