Centrica shale deal sparks green debate

June 14, 2013 at 7:08 AM

LONDON, June 14 (UPI) -- The excitement over British shale natural gas potential isn't compatible with efforts needed to address climate change, the World Wide Fund for Nature said.

British energy company Centrica announced Thursday it acquired a 25 percent stake in the Bowland shale natural gas exploration area in Lancashire from Cuadrilla Resources.

Centrica said it was important to look inland for more energy reserves because of declining production from the North Sea. British consumers may find relief from shale gas if it can offset a growing dependence on imports, the company said.

Jenny Banks, a climate specialist with WWF-UK, said Centrica's deal was a step in the wrong direction.

"Centrica doesn't mention the main problem with shale, namely that chasing after yet more fossil fuels is completely incompatible with efforts to keep below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit of global warming," she said in a statement Thursday.

WWF points to statements from Centrica this year suggesting there may be environmental issues associated with shale natural gas development.

Centrica Chief Executive Officer Sam Laidlaw told Greenpeace last year renewable energy is expensive. If 80 percent of British households switched from natural gas to wind, he said, consumer bills would increase more than 200 percent.

The British government enacted safety regulations for shale development last year in response to minor tremors associated with Cuadrilla's operations.

Like Us on Facebook for more stories from UPI.com  
Related UPI Stories
Latest Headlines
Top Stories
B-52 bombers demo long reach of U.S. air power
Army orders tactical trucks from Oshkosh
Reddit CEO Ellen Pao offers to improve communication in wake of firing scandal
Raytheon wins IDIQ contract for Army sensor systems
Report: Brazil's Petrobras wading dark waters