Shell defense in Nigeria raises eyebrows

Aug. 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM   |   Comments

WASHINGTON, Aug. 6 (UPI) -- A U.S. Supreme Court brief filed by Shell in a case involving alleged rights violations in Nigeria contains "offensive" arguments, an advocacy group said.

Shell, in Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum, is accused of working with the Nigerian government to ensure resistance to operations in the oil-rich Niger Delta was protected by military force.

In a 71-page brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, the company argues the Alien Tort Statute doesn't apply in a case in Nigeria because that law doesn't extend to activity conducted on foreign soil.

"Nothing in the ATS's text, structure, or history contemplates extending it to a case like this one," the brief states.

Earthrights International states that Shell "makes arguments that range from misleading to false to offensive, all with the aim of proving that in no circumstances may U.S. courts consider claims under the Alien Tort Statute involving human rights abuses that took place abroad."

The U.S. government in June filed a brief stating its partial support for Shell in the case, saying the Alien Tort Statute shouldn't be applied.

EarthRights International in July filed Freedom of Information Act requests seeking information about whether the possible business interests of Cabinet-level officials swayed the government's decision in the Kiobel case.

© 2012 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
Most Popular
Auto sales grow 11% in July, Chrysler sales surge 20%
Analysis: Hamas history tied to Israel
Excalibur IB artillery projective enters full-rate production
Army receives first advanced CH-47F helicopter variant
Austrian student files class action suit against Facebook
Trending News