UPI en Español  |   UPI Asia  |   About UPI  |   My Account
Search:
Go

State Department eyes Keystone XL concerns

|
 
A man supporting the Keystone XL pipeline project watches speakers at a State Department hearing to consider if it is in the U.S. national interest in Washington, DC, on October 7, 2011. The pipeline would carry crude oil from Canada through nine U.S. states to Houston, Texas. UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg
A man supporting the Keystone XL pipeline project watches speakers at a State Department hearing to consider if it is in the U.S. national interest in Washington, DC, on October 7, 2011. The pipeline would carry crude oil from Canada through nine U.S. states to Houston, Texas. UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg 
License photo
Published: Oct. 20, 2011 at 7:12 AM

WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- The U.S. State Department said it was reviewing lawmakers' concerns about a potential conflict of interest in the review of the Keystone XL pipeline.

U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Bernard Sanders, Ind.-Vt., said in a letter to the State Department that its decision to hire Texas consulting company Cardno Entrix at the suggestion of Canadian pipeline company TransCanada is suspicious.

"We find it inappropriate that a contractor with financial ties to TransCanada, which publicly promotes itself by identifying TransCanada as a 'major client,' was selected to conduct what is intended to be an objective government review (of the pipeline)," the letter read.

Ties between Cardno Entrix and TransCanada were revealed by The New York Times. Wendy Nassmacher, a spokeswoman for the State Department, told the newspaper that the department has "received the letters and we are currently reviewing them."

The State Department needs to approve the pipeline because it crosses international boundaries. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was criticized for her ties to Paul Elliot, who worked on Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign team and now works as a lobbyist for TransCanada.

Critics of the pipeline complain the project isn't worth the environmental risk though its supporters said it's good for regional energy security.

The State Department, which said it didn't anticipate major environmental problems with the project, is expected to make a decision by the end of the year.

A recent editorial by The New York Times expressed direct opposition to Keystone XL.

Topics: Ron Wyden, Patrick Leahy, Bernard Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Keystone XL Pipeline
Recommended Stories
© 2011 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Star Trek Into Darkness' screening NBC upfronts Met Ball 2013
'Great Gatsby' premieres in New York Spire raised on top of One WTC 2013: Celebrity break ups and divorces
Additional Energy Resources Stories
1 of 16
Tornadoes Devastate Moore, Oklahoma
View Caption
A damaged movie theater is seen in aftermath of a series of tornadoes in Moore, Oklahoma, May 21, 2013. On May 20 a series of tornadoes swept through severals towns south of Oklahoma City leaving a path of destruction and killing at least 24 people. UPI/J.P. Wilson
fark
13 NJ TGI Fridays accused of selling well drinks labeled as premium brands, also not wearing enough...
Mom dies, gives birth, then gets brought back to life
An underground nightclub in a rooftop water tower
Looks like the IRS is targeting another non-profit group seeking tax-exempt status
Survey reveals men think women's beauty peaks at age 29. Reversely, women think men peak during...
As a general rule things that you would bring to a Fark party should not be sent as disaster relief...