facebook
twitter
search
search

TransCanada challenges emissions claims

Oct. 4, 2012 at 7:00 AM
Sign up for our Energy Newsletter

DALLAS, Oct. 4 (UPI) -- Oil sent from Canada through pipelines won't have a dramatic effect on the environment when considering foreign shipments, an executive said from Texas.

Canadian pipeline company TransCanada aims to build the Keystone XL pipeline to add capacity to a network carrying crude oil from Alberta. Parts of the project would run through Texas on its way to refineries along the southern U.S. coast.

TransCanada Vice President Corey Goulet told a Texas energy conference that oil sent by pipeline from Canada would replace some oil imported from Latin American and Middle Eastern markets.

"The amount of crude we use in North America and the U.S. in particular is dependent on the consumer," he was quoted by The Dallas Morning News as saying. "This crude will displace other crudes that will be imported. So the net climate change won't be any different."

Critics of the pipeline proposal say so-called tar sands oil, like the oil designated for Keystone XL, poses more of an environmental risk than conventional crude oil. Texas activist group Public Citizen says greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian crude are three times higher than regular oil while TransCanada said there's a marginal difference.

Related UPI Stories
Latest Headlines
Trending Stories
Ted Cruz campaign pulls ad featuring softcore porn actress
Report: Clinton Foundation subpoenaed by State Dept. watchdog over charity projects
Ruby Rose, Gigi Hadid react to Kanye West's lyric about Taylor Swift
Kristen Wiig impersonates Peyton Manning on 'The Tonight Show'
NYC police officer found guilty of manslaughter in Brooklyn stairway shooting