You can't get in trouble for being friendly


Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on sex, and sexual harassment is sex discrimination. Essentially, the law protects employees from harassment because of sex—and that can include same-sex harassment.

That doesn't mean, however, that every unwanted work relationship is sexual harassment.

As a recent 2nd Circuit case shows, an obsessive interest, unrelated to sex, by one employee in another isn't prohibited.

Recent case: Lucia Guarino began working at St. John Fisher College as an adjunct faculty member after a professor recommended her. She later recommended that Guarino be offered a full-time tenure-track position, which she accepted.

Then the professor began to develop what might be described as an unhealthy or even obsessive interest in being close to Guarino. This push for friendship was devoid of sexual overtures, passes or other acts typically seen in sexual harassment cases.

Instead, the professor would tell Guarino things like "I need you. Where would I be without you? Everything would just fall apart, and "You are amazing, you are great, you are incredible.

Guarino complained to her supervisors, telling them she believed the professor was trying to get her involved in a romantic relationship. The college did nothing about the problem, and Guarino sued, alleging sexual harassment.

Guarino admitted under oath that the professor never made a pass at her, never used sexual language, and never tried to kiss her or touch her or act in any other sexual way.

The court dismissed the case, reasoning that there had been no harassment based on sex. Rather, this was an interpersonal problem, and the law doesn't require employers to protect employees from co-workers who may want friendship or nonsexual companionship from another employee. (Guarino v. St. John Fisher College, No. 08-1531, 2nd Cir., 2009)

Warning: This case doesn't mean you should ignore the types of behavior described. An unhealthy attachment may be a sign of psychological problems. Remember, employers have a legal obligation under state law and federal workplace safety laws to protect employees from physical harm.


Content provided by: Business Management Daily.
Rate:
Digg it
Digg it
Reddit
Reddit
Facebook
Facebook
Fark
Fark
Stumble
Stumble
NewsTrust
NewsTrust

NASA remembers its 2009 accomplishments (22 min)
Mortgage losses still haunt four firms (40 min)
Washington Redskins VP resigns (44 min)
Tap water legal but may be unhealthy
Canadian inflation rises in November
Watercooler Stories
Jockstrip: The world as we know it.
fark
The 10 most irritating, obnoxious, attention-whoring people of 2009
Special toilet means jail guards no longer have to search for contraband with latex gl--MOON RIVER...
Caption these august world leaders
Protip: If you want to remain a member of your exclusive golf club, you might want to make sure...
The old "I'm not drunk, I'm just too fat to walk in a straight line" defense actually works, for...
Woman jailed on $7,500 bond for not returning the 53 DVDs she borrowed from the public library....