Don’t be a victim of a whistle-blower retaliation lawsuit


Sometimes, employees think they can save themselves from being disciplined by making a fuss about possible employer wrongdoing. They assume that whistle-blowing will protect them from being fired, for example, because their employer's timing will look suspect.

Smart employers don't fall for this. Instead, they make certain they have good, fair and solid reasons for whatever disciplinary actions they take. They sleep soundly knowing it takes more than just suspicious timing to win a whistle-blower retaliation lawsuit—and that they have evidence on their side.

Recent case: Kevin Noyes was discharged about five months after he claims to have blown the whistle on his employer. But Noyes had nothing to tie the discharge to his protected whistle-blowing activity. Timing alone isn't enough. (Noyes v. American Tissue Services Foundation, No. 08-1445, 8th Cir., 2009)


Content provided by: Business Management Daily.
Rate:
Digg it
Digg it
Reddit
Reddit
Facebook
Facebook
Fark
Fark
Stumble
Stumble
NewsTrust
NewsTrust

Self-testing may raise grades of students (3 min)
Brits: Sarah, Chris wildest party names (7 min)
New Zealand traffic flasher fined (14 min)
Scientists move closer to HIV vaccine (15 min)
Report: Ryan in Texas Rangers' purchase (17 min)
Mars orbiter resumes science operations (28 min)
Media revenue streams in modern shift (30 min)
fark
"I voted for medical marijuana, but I didn't expect it to be in my backyard," says dumbass who should...
Man wins lottery, does what most men only dream of doing. Sail away to some tropical island? No,...
"Please have a heart and donate...so I don't have to kill you and put your head on a pike"
Your Christmas tree should be a reflection of your family. Subby wonders what garland goes with...
"Nobody can eat fifty sewing needles.""My boy says he can eat fifty sewing needles, he can eat fifty...
If you wear tights, UGGs, and a North Face jacket, you might be a 'Coastie'