facebook
twitter
search
search

Keystone pipeline meets resistance

Dec. 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM

WASHINGTON, Dec. 23 (UPI) -- Environmentalists said the Keystone oil pipeline project under consideration by the U.S. government would be be a huge environmental setback.

The pipeline system that now ends in Oklahoma would extend the pipes to allow Canadian crude oil extracted from oil sands to flow to the Gulf of Mexico, CNNMoney.com reported Thursday.

The U.S. State Department is expected to submit an environmental impact statement on the project early next year.

The oil sands areas of Canada are about the size of Texas, but the heavy oil requires heating to allow it to flow through standard drilling procedures or it can be mined, like coal.

The mining system also requires heat to separate the oil from the sand, adding up to an increase of carbon dioxide emissions of 5 percent to 30 percent compared to most oil production.

The pit required to mine oil in oil sands areas could also be the size of Rhode Island, CNNMoney.com reported.

"We see this as a disaster on many levels," said Ryan Salmon, energy policy adviser at the World Wildlife Fund.

"At the site itself, you're looking at basically wholesale destruction of the ecosystem," he said.

Environmental groups recently concluded a $500,000 advertising effort opposing the project.

But some reason that extraction would continue, anyway, as China is willing to purchase the oil if the United States does not.

Like Us on Facebook for more stories from UPI.com  
Latest Headlines
Top Stories
Compact cannon for British armored vehicles
Kraft-Heinz merger forms world's fifth-largest food-beverage company
Aetna to acquire Humana for $37 billion in cash, stocks
New Zealand military receives medium heavy military trucks
BBC to lay off 1,000 people to make up for $234M in lost revenue