Stanford says he stood out as SEC target

Published: April 21, 2009 at 9:55 AM

HOUSTON, April 21 (UPI) -- Texas financier R. Allen Stanford said he was innocent of running an $8 billion Ponzi scheme, claiming he stood out as a target for regulators.

"As God is my witness, there is no Ponzi scheme, there was no intentional fraud," Stanford said in an interview, the Houston Chronicle reported Tuesday.

Stanford said he was not well versed in the details of the Stanford International Bank in Antigua, which Securities and Exchange Commission authorities seized in February.

Authorities also seized Stanford's personal accounts and those of Chief Financial Officer James Davis and Chief Investment Officer Laura Pendergest-Holt.

Also accused of taking out a fraudulent $1.6 billion loan from his bank, Stanford now has three suits, a wallet full of credit cards he cannot use and an attorney he cannot afford, the newspaper said.

An SEC civil suit claims the bank "reverse-engineered" financial statements to fit predetermined investment goals, the newspaper said.

In the interview, Stanford said he was "a maverick rich Texan, so I'm a pretty colorful moose head to put on the wall."

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Report: Iverson announces NBA retirement (9 min)
Obama's use of 'unprecedented' chided (42 min)
Soderling first through to ATP semifinals
UPI NewsTrack Health and Science News
U.S., Japan to sign 'open skies' agreement
UPI NewsTrack Business
Crude oil prices rebound slightly
fark
Photoshop this guy in reflective shades
Suing Activision over World of Warcraft? Don't forget to subpoena Depeche Mode and Winona Rider,...
Hannity: This is one of the coldest years on record, so global warming is a hoax. Science: This...
Spotted cow removed from Mad River in NY. The image in your mind's eye is wrong
This is why you can't have nice things, America: "rather than a retelling of the Nativity story...
Canadian judge rules that the Happy Gilmore golf swing is wrong, biatch