Bailout churns up skepticism

Published: Sept. 23, 2008 at 7:56 AM

WASHINGTON, Sept. 23 (UPI) -- Voices of skepticism are growing louder over a U.S. Treasury plan to buy $700 billion worth of risky securities from financial firms, various sources said.

Questions arise from the sheer size of the bailout, the plan to put the decision-making power of what securities to buy in the hands of one federal department and the sense that rich executives will come out on top at the expense of the taxpayer, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

Some of the skepticism is aimed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr., who sought to reassure the public in recent months that the financial system was sound.

"This administration is asking for a $700 billion blank check to be put in the hands of Henry Paulson, a guy who totally missed this," Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research told the Times.

Some economists, including former Treasury and Reserve Board economist Douglas Elmendorf, said they believe the bailout should include taxpayers taking over stocks and bonds in the companies they rescue.

"At first it was, 'thank goodness the cavalry is coming,' but what exactly is the cavalry going to do?" Elmendorf asked of the Times.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Rituximab used for Graves' eye disease (3 min)
Recall of Pet Carousel products expanded (3 min)
N.J. commuter train skips stop (8 min)
Thieves sought jewelry, got shampoo (15 min)
Salvation Army sets giant kettle record (20 min)
Antarctic glacial ice loss unprecedented (22 min)
Genes predict advanced melanoma outcome (26 min)
fark
Evidence found of plot to kill cartoonist, but details are sketchy
♫The best part of waking up is a CTA bus crashing into the side of your house♫
The president calls him..."The Crustmaster"
Hello, insurance company, yeah a grizzly bear ate my airplane
Man charged with sexually assaulting 14-year-old girl over several months, even though he paid her...
If you're a cop it's probably best not to wait three days to send a runaway home. You might just...