De Beers settlement means diamond rebates

Published: Jan. 21, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Order reprints
HOUSTON, Jan. 21 (UPI) -- Settlement terms in the class action suit alleging diamond company De Beers fixed prices could mean glittering rebates for many diamond buyers.

The company has agreed to pay customers and diamond merchants $295 million to settle the suit that claimed De Beers tried to monopolize the diamond industry and control prices.

About half the money would go to merchants, the rest to diamond customers, Monday's Chicago Tribune reported.

The settlement applies only to buyers who can prove they purchased their diamonds between 1994 and early 2006. The potential value of the settlement for individuals is estimated to be 30 percent of the value of the diamonds they bought.

De Beers officials did not admit wrongdoing. De Beers controls as much as 40 percent of the diamond industry.

"We haven't accepted the allegations, but we decided to take this step to make sure that consumers still have confidence in the value of their diamonds," said David Prager, De Beers' director of communications.

"That facts are that it's a very competitive industry," he said.


© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Dead Sea in natural wonders competition (<1 min)
Brown seeks Gadhafi's help in kidnap case (17 min)
Bulgaria customs stop 42 illegal migrants (18 min)
Kurdish constitution seen as unity threat (24 min)
Kinney joining 'Mentalist' cast (26 min)
Canadian unemployment eases in June (27 min)
U.S. H1N1 vaccinations to begin in fall (28 min)
fark
It looks like Canada has a bad case of brain freeze: Manitoba has been named the world's leading...
GM emerges from bankruptcy, sees shadow of debt, predicts six more weeks of Buick
Ugly ass baby giraffe born at Jacksonville Zoo. It's got legs that won't quit
Darwin scores first victory in 15 years at annual Running of the Dipshiats in Pamplona
...so here's some ugly-ass hairless baby macaque monkeys that look like George W. Bush
You should never have to apologize for being right. Even when you're the editor of the Farmers'...