Study: Second-hand smoke bad for fetus

Published: July 26, 2005 at 10:01 PM

PITTSBURGH, July 26 (UPI) -- A U.S. study finds that second-hand smoke can be just as bad for developing fetuses as a mother-to-be's smoking.

"This analysis shows not only that smoking during pregnancy causes genetic damage in the developing fetus that can be detected at birth, but also that passive -- or secondary -- exposure causes just as much damage as active smoking, and it is the same kind of damage," said Stephen Grant, an associate professor at the University of Pittsburgh.

Grant re-analyzed data from earlier studies, including one in which he was involved. The authors of the earlier studies found little evidence that second-hand smoke or even maternal smoking was bad or found the evidence inconclusive.

Grant looked for the frequency of induced mutation and redefined non-smokers by examining pregnant women's exposure to second-hand smoke. He said that exposure to tobacco smoke causes mutations in the developing fetus that can have lifelong repercussions.

© 2005 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
UPI NewsTrack Entertainment News (4 min)
Airlines lack policies on face masks (4 min)
Frank Gore named top NFC offensive player (13 min)
Housing starts up in November (17 min)
Schools lax in preventing food illnesses (28 min)
U.S. markets up in advance of Fed decision (29 min)
Global warming impacts wine and corn (41 min)
fark
Parents' Television Council files indecency complaint against "Family Guy" with the FCC. This is...
Nothing says Christmas like a deranged snowman setting fire to foreclosed homes (w/ pics)
Mad scientist facing 5 years in jail if convicted of testing his earthquake generating technology...
Tiger Woods named AP and AshleyMadison.com Player of the Decade
That little boy suspended and ordered to take a psychological evaluation because he drew a stick...
Theme: Unlikely Santa's helpers