Mobile UPI  |   About UPI  |   UPI en Español  |   UPI Arabic  |   UPIU  |   My Account
Search:
Go

Levis trade mark rights backed by EU court

|
|
 
  
Published: Nov. 20, 2001 at 6:27 AM
By CHRISTOPHER WHITE
Advertisement

BRUSSELS, Nov. 20 (UPI) -- The world's best known jeans manufacturer, Levi Strauss, was jubilant Tuesday following a ruling by the European Union's top court that effectively stops supermarkets from importing jeans outside the EU or the European Economic Area and selling them at cut prices.

The long-running dispute centred on the British supermarket chain Tesco which bought Levi jeans supplied to Africa at lower than European wholesale prices and marketed them at cut price in their nationwide grocery chain outlets.

John Littleton, head of Levi's in Europe, greeted the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice decision saying: "This allows us to do what we do best -- make the best jeans in the world."

Levi's successfully complained that the import and sale of their goods -- Levi jeans and 501 -- constituted an infringement of rights under their registered trademarks. Tesco and its associated companies claimed that once sold to a third country the trademark had been exhausted.

The British High Court referred the issue to the European Court of Justice to clarify the concept of consent and the importance of the case prompted five governments -- Germany, France, Italy, Finland and Sweden -- to submit observations.

The court decided that EU law --- known as a Directive --- limits the exhaustion of trade mark rights to where goods have been put on the market in the European Economic Area --- the EU and countries with EA agreements --- and allows the marketing of goods outside the area without exhausting manufacturers rights in the EEA without consent.

This allows the proprietor holding a trademark to control the initial marketing in the EEA of goods bearing the relevant trademark. The court ruled that consent to extinguish trade mark rights must be unequivocally demonstrated and that while consent might be inferred from the placing on of goods on the market outside the EAA this cannot be inferred from the "mere silence" of the trademark proprietor.

Saying that consent must be expressed positively the court said that the absence of contractual reservations at the time of sale cannot imply consent.

The ruling brought an immediate reaction from the European Parliament in Brussels where elected representatives of the EU's 15 member states were sitting Tuesday.

Professor Philip Whitehead, a British Socialist declared: "This is a bad day for consumers. It is an end to cheap goods in stores." Unofficially, MEPs say that over time attempts will be made to loosen the EU directive in the interests of consumers.

Topics: Christopher White
© 2001 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
  
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Snow White and the Huntsman' in London Queen Elizabeth waxwork at Madame Tussauds Street animals of China
Pet expo in Chile American Ballet Theatre's Spring Gala Soyuz rocket launches in Kazakhstan
Additional Business News Stories
1 of 31
Facebook (FB) prepares to begin trading at the Nasdaq in New York City
View Caption
fark
Man in wheelchair tries to cross highway. He's no Frogger
If you are going to pass a forged check, don't forget your driver's license at the store. This important...
Man dies in Jekyll Island triathlon. He could run, but he couldn't Hyde
The Nina, The Pinta, and The Goldberg?
Plan to row across the Atlantic cancelled after crew realized their plan was to row across the farking...
Boy spends eight hours stuck between waterfalls. He should have stuck to the rivers and the lakes...